Please review the Student Poster Judging Criteria, Assignments and Poster Files below.
Lowest score is 0, highest possible score is 19.
You will submit your judging feedback using the survey link HERE!
JUDGING CRITERIA:
1. Title: Should be clear, concise, reflects the content and draw interest of attendees
- 0= Poor or absent
- 1= Needs improvement
- 2= Excellent
2. Format: (1) Adequate whitespace, (2) easy to follow, (3) font is easy to read (large enough, appropriate font choice), (4) visuals have significance and are appropriate to the content.
- 0= Poor or absent (2 elements are present)
- 1= Needs improvement (3 elements are present)
- 2= Excellent (4 elements are present)
3. Grammar, spelling
- 0= Poor or absent (> 2 errors)
- 1= Needs improvement (1-2 errors)
- 2= Excellent (no errors)
4. Background: (1) The problem is clearly identified and stated, (2) significance of the problem to the CNS role and/or nursing clinical practice is clear.
- 0= No (gets 0 points)
- 1= Yes (gets 1 point)
5. Purpose/Objective is adequately describing the project.
- 0= No
- 1= Yes
6. Methods:
For research project: (1) design, (2) subject, (3) setting, (4) variables and (5) intervention(s) are clearly stated.
For non-research project: (1) description of the project, (2) project timeline, and (3) data collection process are clearly stated.
- 0= Poor or absent
- 1= Needs improvement (most elements are present)
- 2= Excellent (all elements are present)
7. Evaluation/Outcome is (1) results are clearly demonstrated with metrics that include pre (three data points) and post-data (one data point) (2) Use of visuals (graphs, tables, etc.) to demonstrate results. For research projects, statistical analysis is included. *If applicable, cost savings/return on investment metrics are included.
- 0= Poor or absent
- 1= Needs improvement
- 2= Excellent
8. Discussion/Implications: (1) lessons learned, (2) project limitations, (3) implications to nursing and/or CNS practice, (4) future direction and recommendations are clearly stated and addressed.
- 0= Poor or absent (2 elements are present)
- 1= Needs improvement (3 elements are present)
- 2= Excellent (4 elements are present)
9. Level of Impact
- 1=One unit
- 2=Multiple Units
- 3=One hospital
- 4=Multiple hospitals
Lowest score is 0, highest possible score is 19.
POSTER ASSIGNMENTS:
| Committee Member | Poster # |
|---|---|
| Jennifer Bath | 1-11 |
| Jessica Buckner | 1-11 |
| Ann Busch | 1-11 |
| Jean Christopher | 1-3, 5-11 |
| Ellen Harvey | 12-22 |
| Cheryl Houseman | 12-22 |
| Jennifer Servant | 12-22 |
| Krissy Jiang | 12-22 |
| Mary Lawanson-Nichols | 4, 12-22 |
| Tracy Montesa | 23-26, 28-33 |
| Maya Shamailov | 23-33 |
| Alicia Ramirez | 23-33 |
| Jackeline Iseler | 23-33 |
| Julie-Kathryn Graham | 34-44 |
| Kieu Tran | 34-44 |
| Amy Shay | 34-44 |
| Caroline Maass | 27, 34-44 |
STUDENT POSTER PDFs:
S1 – Optimizing Charting on the Go in the EHR – Gall
S3 – Tai Chi intervention to prevent cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s – Banfield
S2 – Impact of Empowerment of Nursing Unit Council – Gilmore
S4 – Just-In-Time Training in Critical Care – Arie Emde
S5 – Little Lungs Big Care – Ressman
S6 – Utilizing Teleretinal Screening to Improve Access and Workflow – Pope
S7 – CHECKLIST USE IN OB EMERGENCIES TO COMPLETE CRITICAL ACTIONS USING – Dey-Layn
S8 – Improving Extubation Practices in the Cardiovascular Recovery Unit – Wildman
S9 – Enhance Patient Understanding on Medication Side Effects – Lumor
S10 – Implementation of ECPR Guidelines for the Hospitalized Adult – Edward Rauch
S11 – Pediatric Rapid Response Process Evaluation – Decino
S12 – Impact of an End-of-Life Educational Program on the – Gaskins
S13 – CNS and NPDS Collaborate on ICU Program to Enhance New Graduate – Flynn
S14 – Early Mobility in the ICU – Kolb
S16 – Improving Nurse Knowledge and Confidence with Defibrilation – Cooper
S17 – Optimizing Anemia Management to Minimize Blood Transfusions – Terry
S18 – Reflections on Learning About Age Friendly Healthcare and the 4Ms – Blackwoo
S19 – Implementation of Standardized Bedside Handoff on a Medical – Johnson
S20 – Enhancing Medication Teaching with Pictograms – Pritchard
S21 – A CNS Student Led Quality Improvement Project to Reduce Pediatric – Ruffini
S22 – Implementation of Barcode Tracking – Fare
S23 – CNS Intern Implements Interprofessional Rounding in the ICU – Childs
S24 – Pain Management in Mechanically Ventilated Adults Requiring – Holland
S25 – Enhancing the CNS Student Experience Through Interdisciplinary Clinical Integration – Parry
S26 – Hardiness The Hidden Armor Against Stress and Burnout in Nurses – Smith
S27 – A Multidisciplinary Approach to Enhancing Sterilization – Smith
S28 – Forging Our Own Path_ New-Graduate CNS Transition to Practice – Wilder
S29 – Inside Out Evaluating Imposter Phenomenon in Clinical Nurse – Smith
S30 – Virtual Education to Improve Provider Knowledge – Barcus
S31 – Integrative Review, Educating Nurses about Takotsubo – Riggins
S32 – Community Wellness Initiative_ Addressing Health – Riggins
S33 – Implementation of the Epic Deterioration Index Tool and Algorithm – Beltran
S34 – Implementation of a Geriatric Rib Fracture Protocol – MacKenzie
